WILLIE D. BROWN, PETITIONER,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 2d DCA | 1974-11-27
No. 74-811
HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JT., concur.
303 So. 2d 689 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1974)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the writ of habeas corpus was improvidently issued because the parole revocation hearing predated the Supreme Court's decision in Gagnon v. Scarpelli, which was given only prospective application.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus following a parole revocation hearing held before the Supreme Court's decision in Gagnon v. Scarpelli. The c…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Brown filed his petition for writ of ha-beas corpus, this court issued its writ and respondent has filed his return thereto.

This court originally felt bound by the pronouncements of the United States Supreme Court in Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (rendered May 14, 1973) as to the due process requirements in a parole revocation hearing and, therefore, issued our writ.

In Wolff v. McDonell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935, the United States Supreme Court specifically stated that Gagnon v. Scarpelli, supra, is to receive only prospective application. The revocation of parole hearing in the instant case was held on December 13, 1972, which preceded Gagnon v. Scarpelli, supra. In view of the foregoing, our opinion filed October 25, 1974 is withdrawn and the petition for rehearing is granted.

The writ of habeas corpus was improvidently issued. Said writ is hereby discharged and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the Respondent.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JT., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw