WILLIAM TYRONE FRIERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIAM TYRONE FRIERSON, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
303 So. 2d 698
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See: Robinson v. State, Fla. App. 1964, 161 So. 2d 578; Devlin v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So. 2d 82; Baisden v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So. 2d 194; Shif-rin v. State, Fla.App.1968, 210 So. 2d 18; Lister v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 226 So. 2d 238; Staten v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So. 2d 697; Rollins v. State, Fla.App.1972, 256 So. 2d 541; Skold v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 263 So. 2d 627; United States v. Cooper, 5th Cir. 1973, 472 F. 2d 64; § 924.-33, Fla.Stat.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hampton v. State, 336 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)…SMITH, JJ., concur. . Appellant also challenges certain portions of the trial court’s charge to the jury, but this contention is without merit and does not warrant further discussion. . Florida Statutes 784.06 and 776.011 (1973). McNeal v. State, 303 So. 2d 698 (3 Fla.App. 1974). . Buie v. State, 68 Fla. 320, 67 So. 102 (1914), and Henry v. State, 81 Fla. 763, 89 So. 136 (1921). . Hutchinson v. State, 309 So. 2d 184 ( (Fla.App.1975), and Ryals v. State, 112 Fla. 4, 150 So. 132 (1933). . Hutchinson v. St…
-
Hernandez v. State, 323 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)…23. As an aider and abettor, Hernandez is responsible for all acts committed by his accomplices, including the murder of Sarah Maya. State v. Roby, Fla.1971, 246 So. 2d 566; Foxworth v. State, Fla.1972, 267 So. 2d 647; McNeal v. State, Fla.App.1974, 303 So. 2d 698. Hernandez’ fourth point is that his motion for mistrial should have been granted when Jose Gutierrez stated in the presence of the jury, that Hernandez “ . . . was arrested by the federal . ” Following an objection by de [*321] fense counsel, Guti…
-
Percival M. Marshall v. Dugger, 526 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…y in the person named in the information as custodian of the property which the defendant is accused of taking is unnecessary, as the purpose of the allegation of ownership is to show that the property taken belonged to another. See McNeal v. State, 303 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Matera v. State, 218 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); Ross v. State, 226 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). [*146] Ownership of the property may be laid in the information either in the real owner or the custodian thereof. See Wilcox v…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Baisden v. State, 203 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)
- Shifrin v. State, 210 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
- Carlton Robinson v. State, 161 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
- Devlin v. State, 175 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
- United States v. Cooper, 472 F.2d 64 (5th Cir. 1973)
- Skold v. State, 263 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- Lister v. State, 226 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)
- Cornell Staten v. State, 248 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
- Rollins v. State, 256 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)
- In re Est. of Ethel Fein, 256 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)