SAMUEL J. SHEFFIELD AND BLANCHE SHEFFIELD, HIS WIFE,
v.
JENNIE LLOYD, ETC., ET AL.
SAMUEL J. SHEFFIELD AND BLANCHE SHEFFIELD, HIS WIFE,
JENNIE LLOYD, ETC., ET AL.
151 Fla. 454
Florida Supreme Court (1942)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 10 So. 2d 806
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
On writ of error we review judgment in favor of plaintiff in an ejectment action on directed verdict.
The plaintiffs proved a paramount title to the property involved.
No useful purpose may be served, or valuable result be accomplished, by promulgating an opinion discussing the questions presented in the briefs filed.
It is sufficient to say that the record has been examined in the light of the briefs on behalf of the respective parties and no reversible error is made to appear.
The judgment is affirmed.
So ordered.
BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Light v. Meginniss, 156 Fla. 61 (Fla. 1945)…This holding is not contrary to our previous holdings in the cases of City of Winter Haven v. A. M. Klemm & Son, 132 Fla. 334, 181 So. 153; Jerome H. Shiep & Co. v. Amos, 100 Fla. 863, 130 So. 699; Commercial Fishermen’s Association v. Christensen, 151 Fla. 454, 10 So. (2nd) 322; Spencer v. Hunt, 109 Fla. 248, 147 So. 282 Smith v. Chase, 91 Fla. 1044, 109 So. 24, or McCord v. Conner, 132 Fla. 56, 180 So. 519. On authority of the cases above cited and for the reasons hereinabove stated, the return of the r…
-
Murray M. Sheldon, Inc. v. Azif, 230 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)…at the documents were shown to be a part of the res gestae so as to be admissible under that exception to the hearsay rule. The question of admissibility under that exception is primarily a question for the trial court. Pride v. State, 151 Fla. 473, 10 So. 2d 806 (1943). We do not find an abuse of discretion in the ruling. The second point urges that the trial court erred in failing to rule that the appellees were estopped to claim they did not have the insurance coverage that appellant represented it had s…