JOSE A. CASTILLO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dover Corp. v. Dean, 473 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)…iew of the eases on the subject demonstrates that interviewing jurors after trial is no perfunctory exercise, but rather requires a showing of something more than conjecture and speculation by the movant as to what went wrong. Brassell v. Brethauer, 305 So. 2d 217 (Pla. 4th DCA 1974); National Indent. Co. v. Andrews, 354 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Kasper Instruments, Inc. v. Maurice, 394 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Ortega v. Perrini & Sons, Inc., 371 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). As we said in Brass…
-
Bammac, Inc. v. Grady, 500 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…phenson, 384 So. 2d 1357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Counsel for both sides are equally candid in acknowledging the duty of the courts to see that the code or rules of professional responsibility, by whatever name, are complied with. Brassell v. Brethauer, 305 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Pantori, Inc. v. Stephenson, supra. Not so clear, however, is the question whether it is necessary for this court to find a breach by claimant’s counsel of a specific provision of the rules before condemning the practice complai…
-
Orange Cnty. v. Fuller, 502 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)…So. 2d 831 (Fla. 1986); Kirkland v. Robbins, 385 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), rev. den. 397 So. 2d 779 (Fla.1981); National Indemnity Co. v. Andrews, 354 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), cert. den. 359 So. 2d 1210 (Fla.1978); Brassell v. Brethauer, 305 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). Unless there are sufficient allegations of juror misconduct relating to matters which are extrinsic to the verdict, inquiry into the deliberations of a jury is prohibited. This long-standing rule protects jurors who have perform…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)