INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, A NEW YORK CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF POLLUTION CONTROL, APPELLEE
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, A NEW YORK CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF POLLUTION CONTROL, APPELLEE
305 So. 2d 813
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant having failed to demonstrate prejudicial error, the interlocutory appeal is dismissed.
RAWLS, C. J., JOHNSON, J., and SPECTOR, SAM, Associate Judge (Retired), concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sans Souci v. Div. OF Fla. Land Sales & Condos., 421 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)…the rights of the lessor, 51C C.J.S. Landlord and Tenant § 42d (1968), an assignment, under certain circumstances, can also be a novation. See, e.g., Moring v. Miller, 330 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976) and Reeves v. Don L. Tullis & Associates, Inc., 305 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). One Florida court has observed that “[a] novation is a mutual agreement between the parties concerned for the discharge of a valid existing obligation by the substitution of a valid new contract .... ” Miami National Bank v. For…
-
Sec. Bank, N.A. v. Bellsouth Advertising & Publ'g Corp., 679 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…ir discretion in such a way as to insure that the judgment creditor receives no greater rights against a garnishee than would have been available to the judgment debtor in a proceeding against the garnishee. Reeves v. Don L. Tullis and Assoc., Inc., 305 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). United Presidential Life Insurance Co. v. King, 361 So. 2d 710, 713 (Fla.1978). The garnishee is not, by service of the writ, to be placed in any worse condition than if the defendant, his creditor, had brought suit upon the c…
-
United Presidential Life Ins. Co. v. Macon M. King, 361 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 1978)…ir discretion in such a way as to insure that the judgment creditor receives no greater rights against a garnishee than would have been available to the judgment debtor in a proceeding against the garnishee. Reeves v. Don L. Tullis and Assoc., Inc., 305 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). In' the present case, the garnishee clearly did not have actual notice of the proceedings against it. When the trial judge was presented with facts which made it appear inequitable to enforce the final judgment against the garni…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence