SECURITY MILLS, A CORPORATION,
v.
A. GRAHAM, FRANK YANCEY, INDIVIDUALLY, AND B. B. SAUNDERS AND FRANK YANCEY, AS PARTNERS TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS AS SAUNDERS-YANCEY WAREHOUSE
SECURITY MILLS, A CORPORATION,
A. GRAHAM, FRANK YANCEY, INDIVIDUALLY, AND B. B. SAUNDERS AND FRANK YANCEY, AS PARTNERS TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS AS SAUNDERS-YANCEY WAREHOUSE
151 Fla. 589
Florida Supreme Court (1942)
Caution
Also reported at: 10 So. 2d 77
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said final decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said final decree of the circuit court, be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kosch v. Kosch, 113 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 1959)…the position of the petitioner. By its opinion in Kosch v. Kosch, supra, the district court of appeal took the view that the instant case is controlled by our decisions in Norton v. Norton, 131 Fla. 219, 179 So. 414 and Cohn v. Cohn, 151 Fla. 547, 10 So. 2d 77, 143 A.L.R. 428. We think it sufficient to point out that in the Norton case the property settlement agreement between the parties was a complete, comprehensive final settlement. In other words, when the decree was entered approving the agreement no…
-
Schraner v. Betty Schraner (Emerson), 110 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)…regoing reasons the order appealed from is found to be free of error and is accordingly affirmed. STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD, J., concur. . F.S. § 65.15, F.S. A. . Kosch v. Kosch, Fla.App.1958, 106 So. 2d 600; Cohn v. Cohn, 151 Fla. 547, 10 So. 2d 77, 143 A.L.R. 428; Norton v. Norton, 131 Fla. 219, 179 So. 414. . Marshall v. Bacon, Fla.1957, 97 So. 2d 252; Watson v. Watson, Fla.1956, 88 So. 2d 133. . Cone v. Cone, Fla.1953, 62 So. 2d 907. . Grant v. Corbitt, Fla.1957, 95 So. 2d 25.…
-
West v. West, 301 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)…se is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.10 BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur. . See, Art. IV, § 1, Const, of the U. S. . See, Madsen v. Madsen, 111 N.H. 315, 282 A. 2d 667 (1971). . See, Cohn v. Cohn (1942), 151 Fla. 547, 10 So. 2d 77. .See, Laing v. Rigney (1896), 160 U.S. 531, 16 S.Ct. 366, 40 L.Ed. 525; Cox v. Cox (3d Cir. 1972), 457 F. 2d 1190, 1194; and Maner v. Maner (5th. Cir. 1969), 412 F. 2d 449. . Of. Kosch v. Kosch (Fla.1959), 113 So. 2d 547; and Haas v. Haas (Fla.19…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence