STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEPH PETER D'AGOSTINO, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court reversed suppression of evidence from a search warrant, holding that despite hearsay from an unidentified informant, sufficient corroboration established probable cause and the warrant was valid.
A search warrant supported by hearsay from an unidentified informant is valid when the affiant corroborates key details to establish both the informant's reliability and the reliability of the informant's information.
[1] An informant's tip, though hearsay and from an unidentified source, provides probable cause for a search warrant when the affiant corroborates sufficient details to estab…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePolice obtained a search warrant based largely on hearsay from an unidentified informant, with the affidavit also claiming the defendant had an extens…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Corroboration Of Hearsay cases and more on FLexlaw
OWEN, Chief Judge.
The State appeals an order quashing a search warrant and suppressing evidence seized pursuant thereto.
Although the affidavit supporting the search warrant was based in large measure upon hearsay information from an unidentified informant whose reliability was not shown, the affidavit also set forth facts showing sufficient corroboration by affiant of the details of the report given him to establish both the reliability of the informant and that the informant had obtained his information in a reliable way. United States v. Horton, 5 Cir. 1973, 488 F. 2d 374.
Probable cause for issuance of the warrant having been established by the informant’s tip and sufficient corroboration thereof to insure reliability, that portion of the affidavit alleging that the defendant “has an extensive record of hotel burglaries committed throughout Florida” when the same was established as not true, may be disregarded as surplusage of immaterial matter in view of a showing that affiant did in fact have knowledge that the defendant had been convicted of a single hotel burglary and was presently on bond pending appellate review of that conviction.
The order quashing the affidavit for the search warrant and suppressing the tangible evidence seized pursuant thereto is reversed.
Reversed.
WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. State, 339 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)…Florida courts, in approving those criteria, have required corroboration of an informant’s tip sufficient to establish both the reliability of the informant and that the informant had obtained his information in a reliable way. State v. D’Agostino, 305 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); State v. Middleton, 302 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). In this case Deputy Little unequivocally stated that he did not know and had never seen or even heard of either the Toledo police officer, Jones, or the suspect, Rodgers, f…
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Horton, 488 F.2d 374 (5th Cir. 1973)