SEABOARD RENDERING CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION,
v.
R. L. CONLON
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court denied an application for a supersedeas, which would have stayed an injunction pending appeal, because the application was made to the wrong court. The court clarified that such applications must first be made to the circuit court.
Yes, an application for a supersedeas must be made to the circuit court at the time the appeal is taken or before the record is filed in the Supreme Court, according to Rule 35(a) of the Rules of the Florida Supreme Court.
“The application must be denied because Rule 35(a) of the Rules of this Court requires that such application be made to the circuit court at the time the appeal is taken or before the record on appeal is filed in this Court.”
Establishes the procedural requirement for applying for a supersedeas.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSeaboard Rendering Co. appealed a circuit court's final decree enjoining it from operating a rendering plant. Seaboard sought a supersedeas from the F…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Supersedeas cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal in this cause was prosecuted from a final decree of the Circuit Court of Broward County. enjoining defendant (appellant here) and its agents from operating, maintaining, and conducting or permitting to be operated, maintained, or conducted a rendering plant located on described lands within the jurisdiction of the court.
*618Application is made to this Court for a supersedeas with good and sufficient bond as provided by Section 67.04, Florida Statutes of 1941, to stay the operation of the final decree and all other proceedings in the trial court pending the disposition of the cause on appeal.
The application must be denied because Rule 35(a) of the Rules of this Court requires that such application be made to the circuit court at the time the appeal is taken or before the record on appeal is filed in this Court. The rule applies alike to appeals from injunctive and all other decrees. It is the duty of the circuit courts to hear such applications but their orders in the premises are reviewable as provided by Rule 35(e).
Rule 35 was promulgated pursuant to Section 25.03(5) Revised Statutes of 1941 (Chapter 13870, Acts of 1929), and supersedes Section 67.04, Florida Statutes of 1941, in so far as it requires applications for supersedeas to be made to this Court.
The application is denied without prejudice to apply to the circuit court as the rule provides.
It is so ordered.
'BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
ADAMS, J., not participating.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Warren D. Hinchee et ux. v. Charles E. Fisher et ux., 93 So. 2d 351 (Fla. 1957)…t an unjust enrichment type of relief is made more explicit in the second complaint does not alter the conclusion that for purposes of applying res adjudicata the second complaint is equivalent to the first. See Murphy v. Murphy, 1942, 151 Fla. 370, 10 So. 2d 136; Caldwell v. Massachusetts Bonding and Ins. Co., 1947, 158 Fla. 677, 29 So. 2d 694. Broadly stated, the purpose of the doctrine of res adjudicata is to prevent the relitigation of matters and to enforce the court’s power to finally determine legal i…