BISCAYNE NORTHEAST CORPORATION OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,

v.

CATALINA, INC., RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Thompson v. State, 565 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. 1990)
  …nd Jury, 533 So. 2d 873, 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); accord United States v. Head, 586 F. 2d 508 (5th Cir.1978). Although recordation may be the best and most desirable practice, e.g., State v. McArthur, 296 So. 2d 97, 100 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 306 So. 2d 123 (Fla.1974); United States v. Head, 586 F. 2d at 511, that choice generally is one for the legislature. We agree with McArthur that the interests of justice may require trial courts to order recordation in some instances. McArthur, 296 So. 2d at 100.…
• In re Report OF THE Grand Jury, 533 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …ation to the second grand jury. There is no constitutional or statutory requirement that grand jury proceedings be recorded. U.S. v. Head, 586 F. 2d 508 (5th Cir.1978); State v. McAr-thur, 296 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert, den., McArthur v. State, 306 So. 2d 123 (Fla.1974). Where justice requires it, a member of the grand jury, or the state’s attorney, may be required by the court to testify to any fact except the jury members’ opinions or votes. Jenkins v. State, 35 Fla. 737, 18 So. 182, 186 (1895). Secti…
• 1401 Brickell Assocs., Ltd. v. Stinson, Lyons & Schuette, P.A., 522 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
  …enants by refusing to approve the proposed reasonable sublease renovations. See Prestin v. Mobil Oil Corp., 741 F. 2d 268, 272-73 (9th Cir.1984); Catalina, Inc. v. Biscayne Northeast Corp. of Fla., 296 So. 2d 680, 582-83 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 306 So. 2d 123 (Fla.1974). We further find no error in the trial court’s clarification of its declaratory decree or in its refusal to rehear this modification. See Johnson v. Royal Garden Estates, Inc., 371 So. 2d 577, 579 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Schwab & Co. v. Breez…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Catalina, Inc. v. Biscayne Ne. Corp. OF Fla., 296 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)