BROWARD COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM J. ALSDORF ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1974-12-13
No. 74-982
OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.
306 So. 2d 534 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*535] PER CURIAM.

Upon examination of the interlocutory orders on appeal we are of the opinion that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. At this juncture we can find no prejudice in the action taken by the trial court granting defendant’s motion to dismiss with leave for plaintiffs to file an amended complaint. With respect to the order directing defendant to answer interrogatories we are not persuaded that the entry of the order was beyond the trial court’s authority nor inappropriate under the case as postured before the trial court. See Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corporation, 89 Fla. 446, 105 So. 126 (1925).

Affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Broward Cnty. v. Alsdorf, 306 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)
    …n that no reversible error has been demonstrated. In particular, several of the points raised in this interlocutory appeal were previously considered and found to be without merit. See Broward County v. Alsdorf, Fourth District Court of Appeal Case, 306 So. 2d 534, opinion filed December 13, 1974. We would observe, however, that with respect to amendments to a complaint, although the better practice is to recast the pleading in its entirety designating the pleading as amended, i. e., “first amended complaint”…
  • Broward Cnty. v. Alsdorf, 314 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 1975)
    …Certiorari denied. 306 So. 2d 534. ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw