MAX SHINKEWITZ, APPELLANT,
v.
ANNA SHINKEWITZ, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Supersedeas Bond cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by the petitioner-husband from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage in which the trial court partitioned the marital residence, granted attorney’s fees to the wife’s counsel and set a supersedeas bond.
Appellant has raised four points on appeal challenging these various actions taken by the trial judge.
We have carefully considered each point in light of the record on appeal, the briefs, and arguments of counsel, and' have determined that no reversible error has been demonstrated.
The record shows that the marriage between the parties, each in their seventies, was of short duration (about four months). In our view, the court did not abuse its discretion in resolving the property rights of the couple or in setting a reasonable attorney’s fee.
Therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Jenkins v. Eckerd Corp., 913 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…. See also Dolphins Plus, Inc. v. Hobdy, 650 So. 2d 213, 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Med. Ctr. Health Plan v. Brick, 572 So. 2d 548, 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Neisner Bros., Inc. v. Palm Corp., 394 So. 2d 1106, 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Saltzman v. Ahern, 306 So. 2d 537, 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). This rule applies to commercial leases as any other contract. See, e.g., Neisner Bros., 394 So. 2d at 1107. Delchamps Includes “Its Successors or Assigns” Sandhill argues that the term “Del-champs” in the K & B Lease must…
-
Walters v. McCALL, 450 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)…d by the language employed, there is no room for judicial construction of the language nor interpretation of the words used — if there is no ambiguity in the wording then the intention of the grantor must be ascertained therefrom. Saltzman v. Ahern, 306 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). An unrestricted grant of an easement conveys all such rights as are incidental and necessary to the reasonable and proper enjoyment thereof. If, however, the instrument specifically states the uses or purposes for which the ease…
-
Dolphins Plus, Inc. v. Hobdy, 650 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…2, 143 So. 301, 302 (1932) (“If there is only one construction which will give full effect to all the words of the instrument, it should be followed.”) Loveland v. CSX Transp., Inc., 622 So. 2d 1120, 1121 (Fla.3d DCA 1993) (same); Saltzman v. Ahern, 306 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) (same). “[I]f there is no ambiguity in the language employed, then the intention of the grantor must be ascertained therefrom [that language].” Walters v. McCall, 450 So. 2d 1139, 1142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (citing Saltzman, 306 So…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence