SANTIAGO GARCIA, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
L. C. MORRIS, INC., A CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1974-12-31
No. 74-465
Before HENDRY, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.
306 So. 2d 545 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the subcontractor had no duty to maintain a stop sign absent a showing they caused its removal.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiffs sued a subcontractor for negligence after a stop sign was down during road repairs. The subcontractor was engaged to perform excavation and…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs in the Circuit Court from an adverse summary judgment in an action for negligence.

The judgment at issue in this case involves only the defendant L. C. Morris, Inc., a subcontractor engaged to perform excavation and drainage in connection with certain road repairs on W. 9th Street and W. 2nd Avenue, in the City of Hialeah.

Summarized, the plaintiffs’ complaint charged that a stop sign controlling the northbound traffic on W. 2nd Avenue was down, and the defendant was negligent in replacing or re-erecting the sign.

We have examined the facts of this case as set forth in the plaintiffs’ brief, and it is our conclusion that the trial judge was correct in determining that there is no genuine issue of material fact.

We think this case is closely analogous to the facts in Dickerson, Inc. v. Buckley, Fla.App.1972, 261 So. 2d 570, in which it was held no duty existed on the defendant’s part to maintain a city stop sign in place, absent some showing that the defendant caused the sign to be removed.

Therefore, for the reasons stated, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Oliva v. Signal Constr. Co., Inc., 537 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Garcia v. L.C. Morris, Inc., 306 So. 2d 545, 545-46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Dickerson, Inc. v. Buckley, 261 So. 2d 570, 573 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 268 So. 2d 534 (Fla.1972); cf. Banat v. Armando, 430 So. 2d 503, 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 446 So. 2d 99 (Fla.1984); Rice v. Florida…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw