JOHN MOGUS
v.
MARION INVESTMENT CORPORATION, A CORPORATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A guest injured by a defective faucet handle in a rented room sued the landlord for negligence. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint, holding that a landlord has no duty to maintain safe conditions in leased premises for third-party guests.
The landlord owes no such duty. The amended declaration fails to state a cause of action under the controlling precedent established in Simms v. Kennedy, which defines the rights and duties of landlords and tenants in Florida.
“It is our conclusion, after an examination of the authorities that the case of Simms v. Kennedy, 74 Fla. 411, 76 So. 739, L.R.A. 1918C, is controlling and the allegations of amended declaration fail to meet the rule as enunciated therein.”
Establishes that the controlling precedent of Simms v. Kennedy determines the outcome and bars recovery under the plaintiff's allegations.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe plaintiff was a guest or roomer in a rooming house leased by the defendant, Marion Investment Corporation, to a tenant named Clarence Meffert. Whi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Landlord Liability cases and more on FLexlaw
From a final judgment on demurrer entered for the defendant below by the Circuit Court of Marion County, Florida, an appeal has been perfected to this Court. The amended declaration, consisted of two counts and it is contended here that the amended declaration states a cause of action against the landlord. The landlord leased to a tenant the rooming house and the plaintiff, while a guest or roomer therein, sustained injuries because of a defective spigot handle to a wash basin.
The first count of the amended declaration alleges, in part, that Clarence Meffert, tenant of Marion Investment Corporation, on October 19, 1941, was operating a rooming house or apartment house and rented a room therein to the plaintiff to be used by him as a bedroom. There was a wash basin in the bedroom having a water faucet with a breakable china handle which was known to the defendant, or could have been known by the exercise of ordinary care, but was unknown to the plaintiff. The plaintiff undertook to turn the water into the basin by the use of the spigot handle and when using the spigot handle the same broke and severely cut the plaintiff’s hands, and as a result he sustained enumerated injuries.
*746The second count contains allegations similar to the first count, with the further allegation that “the easily breakable china handle had become cracked or fractured at the time of the accident and that this condition was or should have been known to the defendant at the time.”
Counsel for appellant (plaintiff below) cites Sections 511.01, 511.13, 511.30, 1941 Florida Statutes; 32 C.J. p. 562; 36 C.J. p. 225, Sec. 915; 28 Am. Juris, pp. 581, 620; 32 Am. Juris, pp. 533, 535; Parsons v. Dwight State Co., 301 Mass. 324, 17 N.E. (2nd) 197; 118 A.L.R. p. 1099. Annotation pp. 118 et seq.; Webel v. Yale University, 125 Conn. 515, 7 Atl. (2nd) 215, 123, A.L.R. 863, Annotation p. 870 et seq., to sustain the sufficiency of each count of the amended declaration. We have carefully examined the cited authorities.
It is our conclusion, after an examination of the authorities that the case of Simms v. Kennedy, 74 Fla. 411, 76 So. 739, L.R.A. 1918C, is controlling and the allegations of amended declaration fail to meet the rule as enunciated therein. See Kimmons v. Crawford, 92 Fla. 652, 109 So. 585; 32 Am. Juris. pp. 526-534, par. 662-667; Tiffany on Landlord and Tenant, Vol. 1, pp. 659-697, par. 97-104; Underhill on Landlord and Tenant, Vol. 2, pp. 792-794, par. 480. We fail to find error in the record and accordingly the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
BROWN, C. J., TERRELL and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brooks v. Peters, 157 Fla. 141 (Fla. 1946)…1944, when the explosion occurred and Mary T. Brooks sustained enumerated injuries. Appellants cite and rely on Simms v. Kennedy, 74 Fla. 411, 76 So. 739, L.R.A. 1918C 297; Butler v. Maney, 146 Fla. 33, 200 So. 226, and Mogus v. Marion Inv. Corp., 151 Fla. 744, 10 So. (2nd) 439. These cases have been reviewed in-light of the contention made by counsel for appellants made at the bar of this Court and in their brief. It is not disputed that the supervision and control of both the cubby hole and the heating…
-
Rollins A. Miller v. Sinclair Ref. Co., 268 F.2d 114 (5th Cir. 1959)…ee’s right unless the negligent condition which causes the injury is a violation of law, is a pre-existing defect in construction or is inherently dangerous, or unless the lessor undertakes to keep the premises in repair. Mogus v. Marion Inv. Corp., 151 Fla. 744, 10 So. 2d 439; Kimmons v. Crawford, 92 Fla. 652, 109 So. 585; Simms v. Kennedy, 74 Fla. 411, 76 So. 739, L.R.A.1918C, 297; Smith v. Vincent, 5 Cir., 204 F. 2d 945. Appellant apparently contends that the presence of the gravel on the driveway was a…
Authorities Cited
- Simms v. Kennedy, 74 Fla. 411 (Fla. 1917)
- Kimmons v. Crawford, 92 Fla. 652 (Fla. 1926)