HOWARD NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, A NATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION, ET AL.,
v.
ALBERT I. LODWICK
HOWARD NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, A NATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION, ET AL.,
ALBERT I. LODWICK
151 Fla. 747
Florida Supreme Court (1942)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 10 So. 2d 429
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
A careful study of the record in this case has not clearly revealed error on the part of the chancellor in denying the motion to strike parts of the bill of complaint and to dismiss the pleading, therefore, petition for certiorari is—
Denied.
BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Palm Beach Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Strong, 300 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 1974)…hers without impairing the obligation of contracts, provided a sufficient remedy be left or another sufficient remedy be provided. See Waggoner v. Flack, 188 U.S. 595, 23 S.Ct. 345, 47 L.Ed. 609.” See also: Hillsborough County v. Bregenzer, et al., 151 Fla. 747, 10 So. 2d 498 (1942); Shavers v. Duval County, 73 So. 2d 684 (Fla.1954); State ex rel. Fulton v. Ives, supra. Although we find that Section 83.271, Florida Statutes, is constitutionally valid, we are fully cognizant that a contention might be made…
-
State OF Fla. ex rel. D. A. Hester v. State Bd. OF Admin., 156 Fla. 445 (Fla. 1945)…cle 9, of the Constitution and Acts passed at the 1941 Session of the Legislature, (Chapter 20,659, Chapter 20,300, Chapter 20,301, Chapter 20,302, Chapter 20,303, Chapter 20,648), are even more conclusive. See also Hillsborough County v. Bregenzer, 151 Fla. 747, 10 So. (2nd) 498, and State v. Special Road and Bridge District No. 9 of Polk County, 153 Fla. 44, 13 So. (2nd) 801, the latter having reference to scope and effect of Section 16, Article 9, of the Constitution as related to the point here. But Re…