HENRY COFFEE
v.
BERA L. COFFEE

Fla. | 1942-11-13
BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
151 Fla. 771 Florida Supreme Court (1942) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 10 So. 2d 431
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from a final decree-dismissing a bill for divorce, the charge being adultery. The evidence has been examined and reveals nothing more than suspicion based on circumstantial evidence that fails to show guilt.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Goslinowski v. Goslinowski, 97 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1957)
    …cient facts to justify a reasonable conclusion that such acts were committed. See Engebretsen v. Engebretsen, 151 Fla. 372, 11 So. 2d 322. Cf. Ingraham v. Ingraham, 80 Fla. 75, 85 So. 666; Crews v. Crews, 130 Fla. 499, 178 So. 139; Coffee v. Coffee, 151 Fla. 771, 10 So. 2d 431; Schuberth v. Schuberth, Fla., 1951, 52 So. 2d 332. The appellee announced in the lower court upon the conclusion of the taking of testimony that he did not want a divorce and he has, through his counsel, repeated that position to th…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw