RICHARD D. PRICE, AND ROSEMARIE PRICE, APPELLANTS,
v.
FIREMEN'S FUND AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANIES, A CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEES
RICHARD D. PRICE, AND ROSEMARIE PRICE, APPELLANTS,
FIREMEN'S FUND AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANIES, A CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEES
307 So. 2d 195
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1975)
Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellants’ complaint in the circuit court was dismissed “without prejudice to the Plaintiffs’ refiling their case in the County Court.” This action was improper. See R.C.P. 1.060(a).
Appellants here urge that the circuit judge erred in determining upon the record that the matter in controversy did not exceed the sum of $2,500 exclusive of interest and costs. See Fla.Stat. § 34.01. We find no error upon this point.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nash v. Nash, 688 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court’s award of temporary attorney’s fees finding that such an award was reasonable and not an abuse of discretion. § 61.16, Fla. Stat. (1995); Mueller v. Mueller, 307 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). However, we reverse the entry of the income deduction order solely for the payment of attorney’s fees on the basis that such an order is not sanctioned by section 61.1301, Florida Statutes (1995). Humana Health Plans v. Lawton, 6…
-
Gochenour v. Gochenour, 564 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Locke v. Locke, 413 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Westley v. Westley, 401 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Mueller v. Mueller, 307 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Meltzer v. Meltzer, 262 So. 2d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); §§ 61.13, 61.16, Fla.Stat. (1989).…
-
Wolff v. Wolff, 329 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)…of a 28-month old little girl to her father. There are other points urged for reversal by the appellant hut, in light of the ultimate disposition of this appeal, we find they are either moot or without merit. See: Mueller v. Mueller, Fla.App. 1975, 307 So. 2d 195. In his final judgment, the trial judge awarded custody of the 28-month old daughter to the father although finding both parties to be fit parents. Said award of custody was, in part, predicated upon a finding that the mother was about to depart th…