LUKE U. MILWARD
v.
MYRA ARDELLE MILWARD

Fla. | 1942-12-01
BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur., TERRELL, J., not participating.
152 Fla. 15 Florida Supreme Court (1942) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 10 So. 2d 663
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

The only question ■ presented on this appeal is what amount should be allowed as a reasonable attorneys’s fee. The record and the briefs have been examined and we are of the view that $5,000 is ample compensation for the service rendered. The cause is accordingly reversed and remanded with directions to the chancellor to enter judgment for this amount.

It is so ordered.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

TERRELL, J., not participating.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Zelman v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 645 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
    …(Fla.1978), we hereby ourselves determine that Zelman shall be awarded $100.00 per hour for out-of-court services and $125.00 per hour for the in-court services rendered. See Spiers v. Spiers, 160 Fla. 282, 34 So. 2d 434 (1948); Milward v. Milward, 152 Fla. 15, 10 So. 2d 663 (1942). Although we are empowered to render an actual judgment to this effect, see Posner v. Posner, 257 So. 2d 530 (Fla.1972); Sullivan v. Chase Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 132 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961); In re Vermeulen, 122 So. 2d 3…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw