VERANDER HARVEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
VERANDER HARVEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
308 So. 2d 52
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs filed by the parties. Finding that appellant has failed to demonstrate prejudicial error, the judgment and sentence appealed are
Affirmed.
RAWLS, C. J., and BOYER and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Underwriters Nat'l Assurance Co. v. Earle A. Harrison, 338 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…it, the court is generally bound to affirm the jury’s determination, absent a clear showing that it is erroneous, when it is supported by sufficient competent evidence. See, e. g., Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Coloposcope of America, Inc., 308 So. 2d 52 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Miami Shores Village v. Lingler, 157 So. 2d 716 (Fla.3d DCA 1963); and 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals §§ 308 and 346. Although, in the instant case, if we had been sitting as jurors we might have decided the case differently, after a carefu…
-
Klingshirn Corp. OF Fla., Inc. v. Turk, 334 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…d them to be without merit. The verdict of the jury is supported by substantial competent evidence and no error by the trial court has been made to appear. See, e. g., Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Colposcope of America, Inc., Fla. App. 1975, 308 So. 2d 52; Causeway Marina, Inc. v. Mandel, Fla.App. 1973, 276 So. 2d 71; Brainard v. Poole, Fla.App.1968, 214 So. 2d 510; Land v. Patroni, Fla.App. 1968, 214 So. 2d 94; and 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals §§ 316 and 346. We have considered the record, all points in the…