CHARLES WESLEY ROSE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1975-02-25
No. U-392
JOHNSON, Acting C. J., and BOYER and McCORD, JJ., concur.
308 So. 2d 119 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of the Order revoking his probation and the judgment and sentence entered thereon, contending that there was insufficient evidence to support said order of revocation.

We have carefully examined the record on appeal, the transcript of the hearing and the briefs submitted by counsel. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that there was sufficient, competent evidence to support the decision of the trial judge that appellant had violated the conditions of his probation. Appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error in the proceedings below, the Order revoking probation and the judgment and sentence appealed herein are affirmed.

JOHNSON, Acting C. J., and BOYER and McCORD, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • James v. State, 340 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
    …dge that the defendant had violated the conditions of his probation. Therefore, we affirm the order of revocation of probation. Randolph v. State, 292 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974); Brown v. State, 305 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Rose v. State, 308 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Affirmed.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw