MILLARD HOWARD GRIFFITH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prejudicial Error cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs filed by able counsel. Although the evidence giving rise to entry of the judgment and sentence here appealed was in conflict those conflicts were resolved by the trier of the fact for whose judgment we may not substitute ours. We find no error of law as applied to those facts. Further, the briefs and oral arguments of the parties reveal that each point here presented has been heretofore determined by decisions of this Court and of the Supreme Court of Florida. Nothing would be added to the jurisprudence of this State by again discussing those points here.
Appellant having failed to demonstrate prejudicial error, the judgment and sentence appealed are
Affirmed.
BOYER, Acting C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Garrett v. Morris Kirschman & Co., Inc., 336 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1976)…ett’s income as a result of his injuries. Judgment was entered in favor of each petitioner. On appeal to the District Court of Appeal, First District, that court “remanded for a new trial on the issue of damages,” Morris Kirschman & Co. v. Garrett, 308 So. 2d 575 (1975), with one judge concurring specially in the judgment. The majority concluded that copies of income tax forms which had been filled out by Mr. Garrett’s employer, should not have been used to refresh Mr. Garrett’s recollection, and should not…
-
Damarys Ann Straker v. Lynch, 335 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)…s. Straker’s present condition, Mrs. Straker stated positively that the medical expenses for which compensation was sought were incurred as a result of the August, 1972 accident. (See Morris Kirschman and Company, Inc. v. Garrett, Fla.App. 1st 1975, 308 So. 2d 575; Garrett v. Morris Kirschman and Company, Inc., Sup.Ct.Fla., 336 So. 2d 566, opinion filed June 9, 1976.) That evidence was uncontradicted. Indeed, there was no other evidence on that point. Appellees’ reliance on Haddock v. Robinson, Fla.App. 1st…
-
Rosen v. Rosen, 659 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…s reversed because of a failure of the trial court to receive evidence as to its reasonableness as directed in Rosen v. Rosen, 576 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Morris Kirschman & Co. Inc., and Continental Ins. Co. v. Thomas and Willie Mae Garrett, 308 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). The former wife has a master’s degree in education, the children will both be in college by the fall of 1995, and there is no justifiable reason why the former wife should not enter the work force. We find error in the award of…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence