ANN R. ROULSTON, APPELLANT,

v.

WILLIAM T. ROULSTON, JR., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Simpson v. Frieda L. Simpson, 372 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)
  …rts are prohibited from creating estates for parties, laudable as it might appear, just as they are prohibited from making other types of property settlements for the parties. Palmer v. Palmer, 330 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1976); Ramirez v. Ramirez, 309 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Accordingly, that aspect of the final judgment awarding the wife the husband’s one-half interest in the marital home is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to modify the judgment leaving the parties as tenants in…
• Carlin v. Stan Carlin, 310 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)
  …he trial court. If the trial court’s ruling is not worthy of support then the appellee ought to confess error and join with the appellant in seeking a reversal. Cf. Holden v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Fla.App.1973, 286 So. 2d 218; Ramirez v. Ramirez, 309 So. 2d 25, Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 74-1086 opinion filed February 28, 1975.…
• Sanders v. Sanders, 435 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
  …rts are prohibited from creating estates for parties, laudable as it might appear, just as they are prohibited from making other types of property settlements for the parties. Palmer v. Palmer, 330 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1976); Ramirez v. Ramirez, 309 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Accordingly, that aspect of the final judgment awarding the wife the husband’s one-half interest in the marital home is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to modify the judgment leaving the parties as tenants in…