STEPHEN WILSON DEAL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STEPHEN WILSON DEAL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
309 So. 2d 43
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of the order denying his motion to vacate judgment and sentence entered for the offense of robbery.
We have carefully examined the record-on-appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties. Upon our consideration thereof, we find that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the proceedings below, and the order appealed herein is accordingly
Affirmed.
JOHNSON, Acting C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
First Prudential Bank of W. Palm Beach v. Cmty. Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Riviera Beach, 45 Fla. Supp. 5 (Fla. Cty. Ct. 1976)…is negotiable or non-negotiable is not determined by labeling the writing “non-negotiable” but by its terms. To be negotiable it must be payable to “Order” or “Bearer,” otherwise it is non-negotiable. See also Locke v. Aetna Acceptance Corporation, 309 So. 2d 43 (1st Fla. App. 1975). 4. The certificate of deposit in this case which was admitted as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 1 in evidence and which is attached as an exhibit to this order is not payable “to Order” or “to Bearer.” Consequently, it is not a negot…
-
Rogers v. Willard, 453 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)…PER CURIAM. We reverse the directed verdict entered in favor of the defendant upon a finding that the plaintiff had at least made out a prima facie case for recovery of a debt on a simple contract. See Locke v. Aetna Acceptance Corp., 309 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). See generally 6 Fla.Jur.2d Bills and Notes § 21. We further hold that the court erred in finding the instrument nonnegotiable because it was payable out of “restaurant earnings.” Payment was not conditioned to be made only out o…