JOHN H. UPSHAW

v.

RENUART LUMBER YARDS, INC., EMPLOYER; BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORPORATION, INSURER; AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• The State of Fla. Ex rel. Kenneth Swanboro v. Mayo, 155 Fla. 330 (Fla. 1944)
  …es as this must be definitely alleged and averred to be lewd and lascivious thereby leaving the matter for judicial determination as to whether or not the act charged violates the statute. For the reasons stated, on authority of Kittleson v. State, 152 Fla. 242, 9 So. (2nd) 807, and cases there cited, we must hold that the information charged no offense under the laws of the State of Florida and, therefore, petitioner is now ordered discharged from custody. TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRI…
• State v. Beasley, 317 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 1975)
  …riot. The facts are not sufficiently before us. The information as drawn is clearly inadequate. See Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.140(b) and 3.-140(d)(1), and Florida Criminal Rules and Practice at 53 (The Florida Bar CLE 1974); Kittleson v. State, 152 Fla. 242, 9 So. 2d 807 (1942); Rosin v. Anderson, 155 Fla. 673, 21 So. 2d 143 (1945); Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749, 82 S.Ct. 1038, 8 L.Ed.2d 240 (1962). We reverse the holding of the trial judge that the statute is facially unconsti [*754] tutiona…
• Kelly v. The State of Fla. ex rel. Frank K. Leonard & R. R. Russell, 92 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 1956)
  …r weakens an information to which it is attached. In considering the sufficiency of the information it was improper for the circuit court to consider the contract as a part thereof. Middleton v. State, 74 Fla. 234, 76 So. 785 and Kittleson v. State, 152 Fla. 242, 9 So. 2d 807. In arriving at an answer to the second question, as stated above, an examination of the purpose of the writ of habeas corpus reveals that its primary object is to determine the legality of the restraint under which a person is held a…