DARRELL W. ROBINSON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 2d DCA | 1975-03-21
No. 75-116
GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
310 So. 2d 27 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1975) Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
BOARDMAN, Acting Chief Judge.

. Our review is limited to a determination from the record before us whether the lower court has exceeded its jurisdiction or has otherwise deviated from the essential requirements of law.

We cannot ascertain, with the certainty required, from the record here that the circuit court either exceeded its jurisdiction or deviated from the essential requirements of law.

For the above reasons we find, therefore, that there is no ground for review by certiorari.

Certiorari denied.

GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • State v. McINTYRE, 393 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)
    …nk legal error on the part of the lower [county] court must first be demonstrated and that such error must be of such magnitude that the aggrieved party has effectively been denied his day in court. 347 So. 2d at 840-41. See also Robinson v. State, 310 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). In essence, it seems to be a question of degree. To grant certiorari, the error committed by the court below in its appellate capacity must have been so egregious as to be equivalent to the denial of fundamental rights. In this…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw