ISOM SALTERS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
ISOM SALTERS
STATE OF FLORIDA
152 Fla. 284
Florida Supreme Court (1943)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 10 So. 2d 809
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined. We have given due consideration to the alleged errors relied on for reversal but it is not shown that they were harmful. The judgment is affirmed on authority of Section 924.33, Florida Statutes, 1941.
Affirmed.
BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cornelius v. State, 49 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1950)…ered unless the error complained of was prejudicial or harmful to the substantial rights of the accused and that the introduction of improper or inadmissible evidence must be prejudicial in order to warrant a reversal. Salter v. State, 152 Fla. 284, 10 So. 2d 809; Kelly v. State, 145 Fla. 491, 199 So. 764; McCall v. State, 113 Fla. 469, 152 So. 19; Thomas v. State, 96 Fla. 243, 118 So. 22; Fouts v. State, 101 Fla. 1248, 133 So. 81; Martin v. State, 100 Fla. 16, 129 So. 112; Wallace v. State, 41 Fla. 547, 26…
-
Cleveland Lee Johnson v. State, 252 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 1971)…ircuit Judge, concur. BOYD, J., dissents with opinion. DREW (Retired), J., dissents with opinion and concurring specially with dissenting opinion of BOYD, J. . Williams v. State, Fla.App., 243 So. 2d 215; F.S.A. Section 924.33; Salter v. State, 152 Fla. 284, 10 So. 2d 809. . Vol. 29 Fla.Jur. 226, “Search & Seizure”, § 12; Fletcher v. State, Fla.App., 168 So. 2d 162; Boim v. State, Fla.App., 194 So. 2d 313; Blake v. State, Fla.App., 112 So. 2d 391; State v. Smith, Fla.App., 193 So. 2d 23. . Willia…
-
Mankowski v. State, 83 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 1955)…iew of the conclusive nature of the evidence offered, there can be no reasonable doubt of appellant’s guilt. See Section 924.33, F.S., F.S.A.; Kelly v. State, 145 Fla. 491, 199 So. 764; Cornelius v. State, Fla. 1950, 49 So. 2d 332; Salters v. State, 152 Fla. 284, 10 So. 2d 809. The judgment is therefore affirmed. DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and ROBERTS, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., agrees to conclusion. O’CONNELL, J., not participating.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence