JACK W. MOORE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
JACK W. MOORE
STATE OF FLORIDA
152 Fla. 295
Florida Supreme Court (1943)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 11 So. 2d 486
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
Appeal brings for review judgment of conviction.
The record has been examined in the light of briefs and argument of counsel.
The evidence is found to be entirely insufficient to establish the guilt of the appellant.
*296Judgment reversed.
So ordered.
BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gilday v. State, 168 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)…s a spur of the moment decision by Allen after they arrived at the premises. Therefore, the record failing to contain sufficient evidence to support the conviction of the appellant herein, same is hereby reversed. See: Moore v. State, 152 Fla. 295, 11 So. 2d 486; Rosenblum v. State, Fla.1951, 55 So. 2d 119. Reversed.…
-
Wincor v. State, 212 So. 2d 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)…find substantial competent evidence to convict the appellant of Count IV [forgery of the note] and Count V [uttering the forged note]. Therefore, we are required to reverse these convictions and discharge the appellant. Moore v. State, 152 Fla. 295, 11 So. 2d 486; Rosenblum v. State, Fla. 1951, 55 So. 2d 119; Gilday v. State, Fla.App.1964, 168 So. 2d 205. The principal evidence relied on to establish the forgery of the mortgage was a comparison of the appellant’s signa,; ture on the fingerprint card [which…