FELIO CRUZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Photographic Identification cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
By this appeal the appellant seeks reversal of a judgment of conviction for robbery. The contentions presented by the appellant have been considered in the light of the record, briefs and argument, and we hold no reversible error has been shown. The defendant’s motion for acquittal, claiming insufficiency of the evidence, was properly denied. The trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence of identification, because of the manner in which a preliminary identification was made from photographs was not harmful error. The appellant’s argument that his attorney was improperly restricted in cross-examination is not borne out by the record. The court did not commit error in denying a jury charge requested by the defendant relating to the subject of identification. The requested charge was not a correct statement of the law, and the subject matter was covered in other charges given by the court.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pitts v. State, 473 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…ot have served to clarify the issue and may have been confusing to the jury. We cannot agree with appellant that the instruction was necessary for the presentation of his theory of the case. No error has been shown on the instruction. Cruz v. State, 310 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Wells v. State, 270 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). It is argued in the third point that the court erred in allowing an expert witness as a rebuttal witness. Whether the testimony of a particular witness is cumulative or proper,…
-
Earnest James Brown v. State, 423 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…r required. The issue was adequately covered in the standard jury instructions that were given. State v. Freeman, 380 So. 2d 1288 (Fla.1980); Smith v. State, 375 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So. 2d 1202 (Fla.1980); Cruz v. State, 310 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). For the reasons stated the judgment appealed is affirmed, but the cause is remanded for correction of the sentence in accordance with this opinion. Affirmed and remanded.…
-
Battles v. State, 498 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…Tonya Smith. However, the proposed instruction does not accurately and correctly state the law dealing with self-defense, and in view of that was properly rejected by the trial court. Barwicks v. State, 82 So. 2d 356 (Fla.1955), and Cruz v. State, 310 So. 2d 360 (Fla.3d DCA 1975). Milo Jordon was not on trial below and any finding that he was criminally liable would have been contrary to state law. Moreover, even if the instruction had been properly phrased, any [*1030] error in not giving the instruction w…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence