BOOKER T. BIRDSONG, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Frivolous Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
DePOORTER v. Win Edward DePOORTER, 509 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)…1986); Schneider v. Schneider, 467 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). While unmarried cohabitation raises a presumption of changed circumstances, this factor alone will not support a reduction of alimony. Schneider v. Schneider; Sheffield v. Sheffield, 310 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 328 So. 2d 844 (Fla.1976). See also Langbein, Post-Dissolution Cohabitation: “The Best of Both Worlds?”, 57 Fla.Bar J. 656 (1983). Permanent alimony, such as that awarded in the instant case, serves a support purpo…
-
Woodworth v. Woodworth, 385 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)…. We are of the opinion, in the absence of such expression, that the parties intended this provision to be a property right acquired as a part of the property settlement. Gilbert v. Gilbert, 312 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Sheffield v. Sheffield, 310 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Fowler v. Fowler, 112 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959). IV The fourth issue is whether the trial court erred in awarding appellee attorney’s fees of $1,800.00. We conclude that the award was error under the rationale of Patterson…
-
Kenyon v. Kenyon, 496 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)…petitioning party of a substantial change of circumstances. Under Florida’s present statutory and case law, adultery is not a bar to the award of alimony but is merely a factor to be considered. § 61.08(1), Fla.Stat. (1985). Sheffield v. Sheffield, 310 So. 2d 410, 413 (Fla.1975). As stated by our sister court in adopting the specially concurring opinion in Martin v. Martin, 366 So. 2d 475, 476 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979): [E]vidence [of adultery may not] be employed merely to decrease or enhance an award by way of p…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)