PEARL M. CHASON AND CHARLES J. CHASON, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,
v.
E. JEFFCOAT, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1931-07-11
Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur
102 Fla. 461 Florida Supreme Court (1931) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 135 So. 856
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Gourt upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judg*462ment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the saicl decree; it is, 'therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Gardiner v. Goertner, 110 Fla. 377 (Fla. 1932)
    …cting evidence. His finding should not be disturbed unless it is clearly erroneous or against the manifest weight of the evidence. Day v. Weadock, 101 Fla. 333, 134 So. 525; Fulton v. Clewiston Limited, 100 Fla. 257, 129 So. 773; Creel v. Abernathy, 102 Fla. 461, 136 So. 229; Jordon v. Jordan, 100 Fla. 1576, 132 So. 466; Farrington v. Harrison, 95 Fla. 769; 116 So. 497; Cramer v. Eichelberger, 96 Fla. 683, 118 So. 737; Shipley-Young Co. v. Young, 97 Fla. 46, 119 So. 522; Weaver-Loughridge Lbr. Co. v., Kirkl…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw