JUNIOR WILNON BIRD, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Belvedere Dev. Corp. v. Dep't of Transp., 476 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 1985)
  …61 (Fla.1982); Bryant v. Division of Administration, Department of Transportation, 355 So. 2d 841 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Central & Southern Florida Flood Control District v. Wye River Farms, Inc., 297 So. 2d 323, 327 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), cert. denied, 310 So. 2d 745 (Fla.1975). In summary we hold: (1) Riparian rights are property rights, incorporeal interests in real estate; (2) They may be separated from the upland by bilateral agreement to reserve them in a deed of conveyance or all or any interest in ripari…
• Byron v. State of Fla. ex rel. Robert W. Schellenberg & Robert L. Shevin, 360 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
  …fied potential candidates, and JEA publicly selecting from among the candidates. The arrangement thus sought to preserve a distinction in roles this court recognized in State ex rel. Tindel v. Sharp, 300 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), cert. denied, 310 So. 2d 745 (Fla.1975), holding that the written work product of an educational consultant, employed by a school board to assist in the search for a new superintendent, was the consultant’s “private property” and was not subject to public scrutiny if not delive…
• Division OF Administration v. Decker, 408 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)
  …DOT witnesses to base their valuation estimates on the use of the easement as limited by the plans and specifications. Central & Southern Florida Flood Control District v. Wye River Farms, Inc., 297 So. 2d 323, 327 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), cert. denied 310 So. 2d 745 (Fla.1975). Appellees argue that there remained ambiguities even with the admission of the plans and specifications because the interpretations by DOT’s witnesses made it unclear what rights were acquired in front of the buildings along the easement…