ANTHONY CASH, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Frivolous Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, Anthony Cash, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McDUFFIE v. State, 343 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)…e trial judge repeatedly instructed the jury that it could return a verdict for petit larceny as a lesser included offense of grand larceny. In addition, the victim’s testimony as to the amount of money taken went unchallenged. Cf. Rembert v. State, 311 So. 2d 199 (Fla.3d DCA 1975). Affirmed.…
-
Anders v. State, 407 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…. Cumbie, 380 So. 2d 1031 (Fla.1980); Lewis v. State, 377 So. 2d 640 (Fla.1980); Peterson v. State, 376 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Castor v. State, 365 So. 2d 701 (Fla.1978); Comer v. State, 318 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Rembert v. State, 311 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Sullivan v. State, 303 So. 2d 632 (Fla.1974); Reis v. State, 248 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971).…
-
Thomas v. State, 456 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 1984)…ction was sufficient to correct any negative inference the jury may have drawn from the comment.' There is no basis for reversal on this point. Mayan v. State, 325 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert, denied, 339 So. 2d 1170 (Fla.1976); Rembert v. State, 311 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Even though the judge admitted at the bench that he found the defense witness disgusting, the words, “Get him out of here,” may be seen as the judge’s way of ordering that the trial should proceed with the calling of the next wit…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)