DAN MICHAEL, APPELLANT,
v.
GOLDEN DOLPHIN ENTERPRISES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1990-05-16
No. 89-2646
LETTS, WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur.
561 So. 2d 29 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1990) Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order holding appellant in contempt. According to the Agreed Statement of the Case the motion for contempt was based upon the allegation that appellant had violated the temporary injunction, by a specific act prohibited by the injunction order in which he was a named party. The trial court’s order finds that appellant, an individual, violated the injunction. While appellant contends that he cannot be found individually liable for the acts of his corporation, which was also named in the contempt citation, we can only interpret the facts and the judgment as finding that he personally committed the act warranting the order of contempt.

LETTS, WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Bertram King v. State, 580 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
    …on 775.084, Florida Statutes (1987). At the resentencing, the trial court may again consider whether the habitual offender statute should be applied to appellant. Meehan v. State, 526 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). We recede from Pollard v. State, 561 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) to the extent that it conflicts with this opinion. The factual findings need not be reduced to writing as long as they are made in a reported judicial proceeding. Parker v. State, 546 So. 2d 727 (Fla.1989). REVERSED AND REMANDE…
  • Murray v. State, 602 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
    …s for express findings as to two previous qualifying offenses, one of which was final within the preceding 5 years, and which were not pardoned or set aside later. To reach the result in King, we had to recede from our decision in Pollard v. State, 561 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Pollard was based on Shull v. Dugger, 515 So. 2d 748 (Fla.1987), where the court held that, after a habitual offender sentence had been reversed because it was based on invalid reasons, the resentencing is limited to the guideli…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw