SARAH LANIER
v.
FLORIDA LOUISIANA RED CYPRESS COMPANY, A CORPORATION
SARAH LANIER
FLORIDA LOUISIANA RED CYPRESS COMPANY, A CORPORATION
152 Fla. 428
Florida Supreme Court (1943)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 12 So. 2d 117
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
This is a certificate from the Circuit Court of Duval County under Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court. We do not think the questions certified are within the scope of that rule so the certificate must be. and is hereby denied on authority of Schwob v. Florida Industrial Commission, decided August 4, 1942, not yet reported, wherein we attempted to define the scope of Rule 38.
It is so ordered.
BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
CHAPMAN, J., disqualified.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The First Nat'l Bank & Tr. Co. v. Great Am. Ins. Co., 257 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)…66. And where the certified question does not meet the prerequisites of F.A.R. 4.6, the appellate Court is constrained to decline an answer. Hillsborough County v. Bennett, Fla.1965, 173 So. 2d 688; Lanier v. Florida Louisiana Red Cypress Co., 1943, 152 Fla. 428, 12 So. 2d 117; Times Pub. Co. v. Rowland, 1948, 160 Fla. 736, 36 So. 2d 419; Harvey v. City of Daytona Beach, Fla.1951, 51 So. 2d 186. [*76] The original jurisdiction conferred upon Circuit Courts by Art. V, § 6 of the Constitution, F.S.A., cannot…