FRED PRO, APPELLANT,
v.
YOLANDA JULIEN PRO, APPELLEE
FRED PRO, APPELLANT,
YOLANDA JULIEN PRO, APPELLEE
311 So. 2d 397
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon examination of the record on appeal and upon due consideration of the briefs we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been clearly demonstrated. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilisch v. Wilisch, 335 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…la.Stat. § 64.081. If the judgment is considered as a modification of the judgment in dissolution of marriage, the financial resources of these parties do not support an award of an attorney’s fee to the husband. Cf. Spears v. Spears, Fla.App. 1975, 311 So. 2d 397. We note, further, in support of our holding, that the husband’s pleadings do not contain a prayer for attorney’s fees. No reversible error appears upon the court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint for partition because we have h…
-
Boggan R. Wright v. Ouida Wright, 339 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)…PER CURIAM. That portion of the final judgment which awards to appellee $1,000.00 on account of & reasonable fee for the services of her attorney is vacated. Spears v. Spears, 311 So. 2d 397 (Fla.App. 4th, 1975). The judgment is otherwise AFFIRMED. RAWLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH, J., concur. MILLS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.…