ROXIE L. CALHOUN, ET AL.,

v.

THE SOMERSET COMPANY, A CORPORATION

Citator

Cited By

• Alva Gene Franklin v. State, 257 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1971)
  …Fla.1966), appeal dismissed S87 U.S. 426, 87 S.Ct. 1710, 18 L.Ed.2d 866 (1967) ; Ephraim v. State, 82 Fla. 93, 89 So. 344 (1921) ; Jackson v. State, 84 Fla. 646, 94 So. 505 (1922) ; English v. State, 122 Fla. 77, 164 So. 848 (1935) ; Lason v. State, 152 Fla. 440, 12 So. 2d 305 (1943) ; Fine v. State, 153 Fla. 297, 14 So. 2d 408 (1943) ; and McElveen v. State, 72 So. 2d 785 (Fla.1954). . See Note 2, supra. . See Note 2, supra. . 22 F.L.P., Sodomy, § 2 (p. 326). .Id. . Walsingham v. State, 250 So. 2d 857…
• Virgal E. Swain v. State, 172 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
  …commission of the crime. It is apparent that the particular acts here complained of were not included in the crime at common law. See Ephraim v. State, 82 Fla. 93, 89 So. 344 (1921). We believe that a reading of the Florida cases of Lason v. State, 152 Fla. 440, 12 So. 2d 305 (1943) and Fine v. State, supra, support the conclusion that penetration is a necessary element of the particular crime charged in the information before us. We must therefore resist the suggestion of the State that we broaden the sc…
• Wright v. State, 250 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971)
  …punishable according to the common law ingredients, as well as by those set forth in the statute, or by a combination of the two. Ephraim v. State, 1921, 82 Fla. 93, 89 So. 344; Jackson v. State, 1922, 84 Fla. 646, 94 So. 505; Lason v. State, 1943, 152 Fla. 440, 12 So. 2d 305; Delaney v. State, Fla.1966, 190 So. 2d 578; Swain v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So. 2d 3; Bivins v. State, Fla.App.1968, 208 So. 2d 666. The trial Court here charged in general terms that crime against nature includes copulation betwee…