JIM MCDONALD AND JOSE CIVIT RIOS, APPELLANTS,
v.
RASHIDA TARAFDAR, APPELLEE
JIM MCDONALD AND JOSE CIVIT RIOS, APPELLANTS,
RASHIDA TARAFDAR, APPELLEE
311 So. 2d 754
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Bolles v. O’Brien, 63 Fla. 342, 59 So. 133; Halstead v. Florence Citrus Growers Ass’n, 104 Fla. 21, 139 So. 132; Gerlach v. Donnelly, Fla.1958, 98 So. 2d 493; Nelson v. Walden, Fla.App.1966, 186 So. 2d 517.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Floval OIL Corp. v. Munoz, 679 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…ould not have lawfully found in favor of the plaintiffs on either of their alternative theories of liability. See McKinnon v. Lewis, 60 Fla. 125, 53 So. 940 (1910); Daniels v. Weiss, 385 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Baker v. Marvin A Hollub & Co., 311 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). We agree. The plaintiffs first argued below that Floval was the decedent’s employer, and therefore, owed a duty to provide him with a safe work environment. The trial court correctly recognized that under this theory Flo-val wou…
Authorities Cited
- Halstead v. Florence Citrus Growers Ass'n, 104 Fla. 21 (Fla. 1932)
- Bolles v. O'Brien, 63 Fla. 342 (Fla. 1912)
- Kingsley H. Gerlach v. Jess Stanley Donnelly under the Last Will and Testament of Emmett Donnelly, 98 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 1957)
- Nelson v. Walden, 186 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)