C. G. R. MEDICAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
JERRY S. SHARE, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1975-05-06
No. 74-1283
Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.
312 So. 2d 243 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See 6551 Collins Avenue Corp. v. Millen, Fla.1958, 104 So. 2d 337; Stewart v. Cook, Fla.App.1969, 218 So. 2d 491; American Express Company v. Juhasz, Fla.App.1973, 281 So. 2d 244; Clinica Union Latina, Inc. v. Seaboard Life Insurance Company of America, Fla.App.1974, 305 So. 2d 244.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rubin James Mauldin v. State, 382 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
    …ecognize that a defendant’s ability to recollect the circumstances surrounding a shooting is important. Nevertheless, amnesia, in and of itself, does not, per se, render him incapable of standing trial or of receiving a fair trial. Robbins v. State, 312 So. 2d 243, 245 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1975). Appellant has simply made a bare conclusory allegation, that he was unable to answer some questions. He does not allege the questions he was unable to answer or their importance to his defense. Since appellant has not demon…
  • Drysdale v. State, 325 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)
    …(Fla.1967); Jefferson v. State, supra; Rowe v. State, 84 So. 2d 709 (Fla.1956); Adams v. State, 153 Fla. 68, 13 So. 2d 610 (1943); Keir v. State, 152 Fla. 389, 11 So. 2d 886 (1943); Parrish v. State, 90 Fla. 25, 105 So. 130 (1925); Robbins v. State, 312 So. 2d 243 (Fla.App.2nd 1975); Hester v. State, 310 So. 2d 455 (Fla.App.2nd 1975); Sciortino v. State, 115 So. 2d 93 (Fla.App.2nd 1959); 3 Wharton, Criminal Evidence, § 691 (13th ed. 1973). Exactly what quantum of independent proof is required to meet this la…
  • Teague v. State, 390 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
    …it behind her back. This evidence contradicts appellant’s testimony that she was repeatedly assaulted and feared for her life. A defendant who relies on self-defense has the burden of producing or going forward with the evidence. Robbins v. State, 312 So. 2d 243 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); Bolin v. State, 297 So. 2d 317 (Fla.3d DCA 1974). To justify a homicide on the grounds of self-defense, the situation must be such as to induce a reasonably prudent person to believe that danger was imminent and that there was a r…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw