DENNIS G. WILSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Appellant's conviction for assault with intent to commit robbery was affirmed where the trial court's refusal to order a transcript of guilty plea proceedings did not violate his constitutional right to appellate review, as established precedent in the First District Court of Appeal.
A trial court's refusal to order a transcript of guilty plea proceedings does not violate an appellant's constitutional right to appellate review.
[1] A trial court's refusal to order a transcript of guilty plea proceedings does not deprive an appellant of constitutional appellate review rights.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant was convicted of assault with intent to commit robbery pursuant to a guilty plea. The assistant public defender stated he could not assign a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Assault With Intent To Commit Robbery cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction, entered pursuant to a guilty plea, of assault with intent to commit a felony, to wit: robbery.
The sole issue raised on appeal is whether appellant was denied his constitutional right to an appellate review of his conviction by the trial court’s refusal to order transcribed the proceedings surrounding the entry of his plea of guilty. It should be noted that in the Motion for Order Requiring Transcript filed below, the assistant public defender stated that he could not “in good conscience assign any error to the proceedings in this court.” The assignments of error later filed by the Second Circuit’s Public Defender’s Office relate solely to the trial court’s refusal to grant appellant’s motion for a transcript. There is no mention whatsoever concerning appellant’s plea or the jurisdiction of the trial court.
This Court has previously decided the issue raised in this appeal adversely to appellant in the cases of Moore v. State, 298 So. 2d 561 (Fla.App. 1st, 1974), Winters v. State, Case No. X-103, and Martin v. State, Case No. X-173 (Orders filed March 5, 1975). Also see Cueni v. State, 303 So. 2d 411 (Fla.App. 1st, 1974) cert. den. on March 13, 1975, 310 So. 2d 738. Upon the authority of the above cited cases, the judgment and sentence appealed herein is affirmed.
JOHNSON, Acting C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Weeks v. State, 316 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)…s appeal adversely to appellant in the cases of Moore v. State, 298 So. 2d 561 (Fla.App. 1st, 1974); Winters v. State, Case No. X-103, and Martin v. State, Case No. X-173 (Orders granting motions to dismiss filed March 5, 1975); and Wilson v. State, 312 So. 2d 252 (Fla.App. 1st, 1975). Also see Cueni v. State, 303 So. 2d 411 (Fla.App. 1st, 1974) cert. den. 310 So. 2d 738 (Fla.1975). Upon the authority of the above cited cases, the judgments and sentences appealed herein are affirmed. RAWLS, Acting C. J., and…
-
Wilson v. State, 324 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1975)…Certiorari denied. 312 So. 2d 252. ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.…
-
Grant v. State, 325 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 1975)…Certiorari denied. 312 So. 2d 252. ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, OVERTON and HATCHETT, JJ., concur. BOYD, J., dissents.…
Authorities Cited
- Moore v. State, 298 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
- Cueni v. State, 303 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
- Baldwin v. Louie L. Wainwright, 310 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 1975)
- Cueni v. State, 310 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 1975)