CLYDE RONALD PARENT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1975-05-09
No. 74-884
WALDEN, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
312 So. 2d 482 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his probation revocation and sentence thereunder. We affirm on the premise of Brown v. State, 305 So. 2d 309 (4th D.C.A.Fla.1974):

“[F.S. 924.06] clearly limits this appeal to review of proceedings that occurred after the entry of the order of probation.”

Appellant has collaterally questioned his original sentence. We are not unaware of Farhat v. State, 293 So. 2d 723 (1st D.C.A. Fla.1974), in which a felony judgment on insufficient evidence limited any sentencing thereafter if probation were revoked, but deem it inapplicable to this circumstance because appellant here did not timely appeal his adjudication and sentence as did the defendant in Farhat. We affirm with no restrictions upon appellant’s right to make a motion under F.R.Cr.P. 3.850, if there is any question of new evidence.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • The Sch. Bd. OF Broward Cnty. v. Price, 362 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. 1978)
    …re it was entertained as a petition for common law certiorari. The District Court denied certiorari without prejudice to the petitioners’ right to raise the constitutional issue on appeal from a final judgment. Price v. Unigard Mutual Insurance Co., 312 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). On remand to the Circuit Court the plaintiffs were ordered to amend their complaint in compliance with the court’s first order. The complaint was amended to drop the insurer as a named defendant in the style of the case and to d…
  • Price v. Sch. Bd. OF Broward Cnty., 342 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)
    …nce company contained in Section 230.23(9)(d)(2) was unconstitutional. We denied certiorari “without prejudice to petitioners’ right to raise the same issues on appeal from the final judgment in the cause.” Price v. Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, 312 So. 2d 482 (Fla.4th D.C.A.1975). As fate would have it, on remand the case was tried and the jury returned a verdict for the defendant School Board. As one would expect, plaintiffs have filed this appeal from the final judgment, and the sole assignment of err…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw