FRANK H. RODRIGUEZ

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• Abernathy v. Gruppo, 119 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960)
  …hat Mr. Gruppo was head of the family. He was gainfully employed, and Mrs. Gruppo was not. Property owned by a wife does not become homestead merely because it is the home of herself and her husband who is the head of the family. Nelson v. Franklin, 152 Fla. 694, 12 So. 2d 771. Bessemer Properties, Inc., v. Gamble, 158 Fla. 38, 27 So. 2d 832, taken by the chancellor as authority to the contrary, holds that the ownership of the head of the family need not be of a legal title; the equitable title is sufficien…
• Stephens v. Campbell, 70 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 1954)
  …ife was the owner of the homestead. She left two children by a previous -marriage who made no attack on the will. The surviving husband claims an interest in the homestead, contending that he was a dependent of the deceased wife. Nelson v. Franklin, 152 Fla. 694, 12 So. 2d 771 is relied on to support this contention. The facts in Nelson v. Franklin are in many r.espects similar to those in the case at bar, except in the Nelson case the husband was the head of the family while in this case it was alleged and…
• Doing v. Riley, 176 F.2d 449 (5th Cir. 1949)
  …te property is an interest less than entire m the place of abode'of the family. By the same token, the husband would not lose any legal or equitable interest in the family domicile, if any he had,' upon the death of the wife. In Nelson v. Franklin, 152 Fla. 694, 12 So. 2d 771, Nelson and his wife moved to the home of the wife where they lived until her death.-. Thereupon Nelson, as the surviving husband, brought suit for partition and division of this home. He predicated his right to partition on the groun…