JERROLD KNEE, AS TRUSTEE, APPELLANT,
v.
J. PIERCE SMITH, AS TAX ASSESSOR OF ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an Order denying appellant’s motion for rehearing and amendment to complaint after summary judgment had been entered in appellee’s favor in a suit brought by appellant contest ing the refusal of appellee to grant an agricultural assessment to appellant’s land.
Although the notice of appeal in this cause bears a filing date of one day in excess of the jurisdictional' 30 day period, it appears from the affidavits submitted to this Court that the Clerk’s office actually received the notice of appeal within the 30 day jurisdictional period. We thus accept jurisdiction of this cause under the authority of Thomas v. City of Gainesville, 220 So. 2d 644 (Fla.App.1st, 1969), affirmed at 229 So. 2d 833 (Fla.1969), and Mills v. Avon Park Motor Company, 223 So. 2d 802 (Fla.App.2nd, 1969).
We have heard oral argument in this cause and have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the proceedings below. The Order appealed herein is affirmed.
RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and MILLS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Weintraub v. Seymour Alter, 482 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…ppearance of a later filing date which is stamped by the said clerk on the face of the notice. See, e.g., Mayers v. The Bankers Life Co., 421 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Cook v. Walgreen Co., 399 So. 2d 523, 524 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Knee v. Smith, 313 So. 2d 117, 118 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert. denied, 330 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1976); accord Graves v. General Insurance Co., 381 F. 2d 517 (10th Cir.1967); People ex rel. Trost v. Bird, 184 A.D. 779, 172 N.Y.S. 412 (N.Y.App.Div.1918). Ill Turning to the instant ca…
-
Pettigrew & Bailey v. Cecyl L. Pickle, 429 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…corrected by the court. Town of Hialeah Gardens v. Hendry, 376 So. 2d 1162 (Fla.1979); R.R. Ricou & Sons v. Merwin, 94 Fla. 86, 113 So. 745. (1927); Luhrs v. State, 394 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.540(a);7 see also Knee v. Smith, 313 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert. denied, 330 So. 2d 726 (Fla.1976). For these reasons, we affirm the summary judgment entered by the trial court. . These partners are not participants in this action. . The release executed by Pettigrew and Bailey state…
-
Strax Rejuvenation & Aesthetics Inst., Inc. v. Shield, 24 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…’s time stamp. Prior to the rule’s amendment, it appears that at least two courts permitted a party to rebut the presumption that the clerk’s time stamp reflects the actual date a paper was filed with the clerk of the trial court. In Knee v. Smith, 313 So. 2d 117, 118 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), the First District Court of Appeal accepted jurisdiction of an appeal of an order granting summary judgment despite the fact that the notice of appeal bore a clerk’s time stamp date that made the filing of the notice one da…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- City OF Gainesville v. Thomas, 229 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1969)
- Raymond Mills & the Emp'rs' Liab. Assurance Corp. v. Avon Park Motor Co. & Am. Fire & Cas. Co., 223 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)
- Thomas v. The City OF Gainesville, 220 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)