VIOLET VAN NATTA IDE, A WIDOW,
v.
CITY OF ST. CLOUD, FLORIDA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Fla. | 1943-04-30
BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur., SEBRING, J., agrees and concurs in the conclusion., THOMAS, J., agrees to conclusion only.
152 Fla. 837 Florida Supreme Court (1943) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 13 So.2d 448 · 13 So. 2d 208 · 1943 Fla. LEXIS 1044
Cited by 111 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

This is the second appearance here of this case. See Ide v. City of St. Cloud, 150 Fla. 806, 8 So. (2nd) 924. After a careful consideration of the record and the arguments and briefs of counsel, our conclusion is that the trial court correctly construed the meaning and effect of our former opinion and mandate in this case and properly applied the same in all of its rulings now brought’before us for review. As the record discloses no error, the judgment is hereby

Affirmed.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

SEBRING, J., agrees and concurs in the conclusion.

THOMAS, J., agrees to conclusion only.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (42 total)

  • Eddy v. Stauffer, 160 Fla. 944 (Fla. 1948)
    …pressed to him “an unqualified preference to remain in the custody” of his mother. Although the minor’s preference is never controlling, the desire of a strapping six-foot boy of high school age should be given great weight. (Fielding v. Highsmith, 152 Fla. 837, 13 So. (2nd) 208; State ex rel Cline v. Cline, 91 Fla. 300, 107 So 446; Marshall v. Reams, 32 Fla. 499, 14 So. 95.) It is our opinion that the passage of time has wrought such a change of conditions as to justify the application of the almost unive…
  • Wiggins v. Rolls, 100 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 1958)
    …ely severs the relationship of parent and child. The matter of what might appear to be for the best interests of a minor in determining temporary or prolonged custody will not always support a decree of adoption. Fielding v. Highsmith, 152 Fla. 837, 13 So. 2d 208; Browning v. Favreau, Fla.1952, 60 So. 2d 186. We are not here losing sight of the rule that the courts will always consider first and primarily the welfare of the minor. At the same time we are of the view that due regard should be given to the ri…
  • Mrs. v. N. (Minnie Belle) Vandiver, 139 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)
    …43 Fla. 1, 29 So. 442 (1901), this court said: “The true test of who is the head of a family, within the contemplation of our homestead provisions, must be found in the circumstances of the case.” In Hillsborough Inv. Co. v. Wilcox, 152 Fla. 889, 13 So. 2d 448 (1942), the court said: “Who is the head of a family within the meaning of the constitution, exempting homesteads from forced sale, must be determined from the facts of each case; there is no rule or invariable test, based solely upon dependence, e…

Previewing 3 of 42 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw