HAROLD SMITH AND PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF DADE COUNTY, APPELLEE; MICHAEL LEE CHAMBERS AND PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, APPELLANTS, V. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF DADE COUNTY, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1975-06-10
Nos. 74-1772, 74-1773
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
314 So. 2d 161 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*162] PER CURIAM.

These appeals, by a surety bonding company, are from orders of the circuit court denying the company’s motion to vacate es-treature of bonds. We affirm upon a holding that the record does not show that the appellant presented to the trial court the grounds now urged as the basis of these appeals. See Paul v. Kanter, Fla.App.1963, 155 So. 2d 402, 403.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Emilio Reyes v. State, 369 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
    …iently established. We affirm upon a holding that the record affirmatively shows the issue was never-presented to the trial judge and defendant failed to move for acquittal upon that ground or for a new trial. See Smith v. State ex rel. Dade County, 314 So. 2d 161 (Fla.3d DCA 1975). Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw