STODDARD PICKRELL, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Gray, 435 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1983)
  …are proved at trial. See, e.g., Tracey v. State, 130 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 1961); State v. Fields, 390 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Haselden v. State, 386 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Caves v. State, 302 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 314 So. 2d 585 (Fla.1975). The state points out that here the information was drafted substantially in the language of the statute, and concludes that any omitted matters were non-essential. Since any defects were thus non-fundamental and could easily have been re…
• State v. Dunmann, 427 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1983)
  …prive has been noted as the distinction between larceny of an automobile and the temporary unauthorized use of such a vehicle. Austin v. Wainwright, 305 So. 2d 845 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Caves v. State, 302 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 314 So. 2d 585 (Fla.1975). It is well established, however, that the legislature has the power to dispense with intent as an element of a crime and to prescribe punishment without regard to the mental attitude of an accused. As this Court has previously stated:…
• King v. State, 590 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …fy as to its method of preparation and reliability. Therefore, the trial court should have sustained the hearsay objection. See Cofield v. State, 474 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Pickrell v. State, 301 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 314 So. 2d 585 (Fla.1975). Without the improperly admitted testimony, the evidence is legally insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that appellant is an habitual felony offender. Accordingly, we are compelled to vacate appellant’s sentence, and to rema…