EARL LOWELL LASSITTER, PETITIONER,
v.
DENNIS WALTON, RESPONDENT; EARL LOWELL LASSITTER, PETITIONER, V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO. 675, RESPONDENT; EARL LOWELL LASSITTER, PETITIONER, V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, RESPONDENT; INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, PETITIONER, V. EARL LOWELL LASSITTER ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Certiorari Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
Certiorari is granted and the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal 295 So. 2d 634 is quashed on the basis of Rinaldi v. Aaron, 314 So. 2d 762, decided by this Court today, April 30, 1975.
On consideration of the Petition for Clarification and/or Rehearing filed by International Union of Operating Engineers, it is ordered that said petition is granted, and it is further ordered:
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Cross-Petition for Writ of Certiorari, jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Florida Appellate Rule 4.5, subd. c(6), and it appearing to the Court that it is without jurisdiction, it is ordered that the Petition and Cross-Petition for Writ of Certiorari be and the same are hereby denied.
ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.
Petitions for Certiorari are granted and the decision of the Fourth District Court of the record deemed necessary to reflect sistent with Rinaldi v. Aaron, 314 So. 2d 762, decided by this Court April 30, 1975, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur. The Cross-Petition for Writ of Certio-rari filed in the above cases is hereby denied.
ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
The Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 1978)…te brief, as satisfactory evidence of “influences” which aroused the jury’s passion, let alone as evidence of “the amount of the excess.” See International Union of Operating Eng. v. Lassitter, 295 So. 2d 634, 639 n. 4 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), reversed, 314 So. 2d 761 (Fla.1975), mandate conformed to, 325 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), reversed on other grounds, 349 So. 2d 622 (Fla.1976). Of the original three, but a single ground remains for trial court intervention to order new trials on account of excessive…
-
Lassitter v. Int'l Union OF Operating Eng'rs, 349 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 1976)
-
Folwell v. Bernard, 477 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…1984). We adhere to the foregoing principles. The appellees rest a substantial portion of their position in support of the judgment upon International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 675 v. Lassitter, 295 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), rev’d., 314 So. 2d 761 (Fla.1975). We harbor grave doubt as to the correctness of Lassitter in the light of Shimman v. Frank, 625 F. 2d 80, 98 n. 37 (6th Cir.1980). In any event, we perceive the Constitution and Canons of the Diocese to be in the nature of a contract betw…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Rinaldi v. Aaron, 314 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 1975)
- Int'l Union OF Operating Eng'rs v. Lassitter, 295 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)