JONES & BRAIDO, INC. AND AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONERS,

v.

GEORGE M. MIKKELSON AND STATE OF FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Pearce, 336 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
  …ortion of the speedy trial period has run. It will therefore frequently be difficult if not impossible to render an appellate decision within the unextended period for speedy trial. See State v. Wilson, 305 So. 2d 232 (Fla.App. 3d, 1974), cert. den. 314 So. 2d 781 (Fla.1975). Therefore, given the State’s right to appeal the interlocutory orders described in § 924.071(1), an automatic stay of the trial and a corresponding extension of the speedy trial period is essential to the effectiveness of the appeal. Alt…
• The Citizens OF the State of Fla. v. Mayo, 316 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 1975)
  …ceedings. . Section 366.06(4), Florida Statutes (1974 Supplement). . This action is consistent with our prior actions in Citizens of the State of Florida v. Mayo, Fla., 311 So. 2d 669 (Gulf Power Company); Citizens of the State of Florida v. Mayo, 314 So. 2d 781 (Florida Power & Light Company); and Citizens of the State of Florida v. Mayo, 314 So. 2d 781 (Tampa Electric Company).…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Maule Indus., Inc. v. Mayo, 342 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 1976)
  …, and BOYD, SUND-BERG and ROBERTS (Retired), JJ., concur. . Public counsel requested review of the interim award here, but the petition was dismissed on the basis of a motion noting that the interim award was not final. Citizens of Florida v. Mayo, 314 So. 2d 781 (Fla.1975). We have determined that interim awards are reviewable only after final action by the Commission. Citizens of Florida v. Mayo (Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co.), 322 So. 2d 911 (Fla.1975); Citizens of Florida v. Mayo (Florida Power Corp.), 3…