INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, A CORPORATION,

v.

CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS BROWN

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Donahue v. Davis, 68 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 1953)
  …nst whom the claim is made. Brundage v. O’Berry, 101 Fla. 320, 134 So. 520; Gray v. Gray, 91 Fla. 103, 107 So. 261; Coral Realty Co. v. Peacock Holding Co., 103 Fla. 916, 138 So. 622; City of Miami Beach v. Miami Beach Improvement Co., 153 Fla. 107, 14 So. 2d 172. It is plain that the complaint in the prior suit and the complaint in the present suit were framed upon entirely different theories and sought entirely different relief. 'Consequently the doctrine of res judicata is not applicable^ because the thi…
• Oceanic Int'l Corp. v. Lantana Boatyard, 402 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …levant, we discuss it here briefly. Appellee takes the position that if in fact Oceanic violated the covenant then, even if the assignment from Delex to Oceanic is recognized, Oceanic forfeited its rights to commissions, relying on Ross v. Calamia, 153 Fla. 151, 13 So. 2d 916 (1943). We read the case differently. In our view, commissions already earned (due and to become due on reorder) are not forfeited by a subsequent violation of the covenant. Having previously concluded that the final judgment is erro…
• Matthews v. Olive M. Matthews, 133 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)
  …Trust Co., 1935, 119 Fla. 718, 162 So. 323; State ex rel. Sbordy v. Rowlett, 1939, 138 Fla. 330, 190 So. 59, 123 A.L.R. 769; State v. Dubose, 1943, 152 Fla. 304, 11 So. 2d 477; City of Miami Beach v. Miami Beach Improvement Co., 1943, 153 Fla. 107, 14 So. 2d 172; Donahue v. Davis, Fla.1953, 68 So. 2d 163; Martin v. Arrow Cabs, Inc., Fla.App.1958, 107 So. 2d 394. . American Process Co. v. Florida White Pressed Brick Co., 1908, 56 Fla. 116, 47 So. 942; Brundage v. O’Berry, 1931, 101 Fla. 320, 134 So. 520; Sh…