HENRY GRAY, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Melendez, 392 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …eve that the vehicle contained contraband. Adams v. State, 375 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979) cert. denied, 385 So. 2d 754 (Fla.1980); Smith v. State, 363 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); State v. Flores, 305 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974) cert. denied, 315 So. 2d 189 (Fla.1975). Thus, the question is whether Officer Leach was justified in entering the vehicle and seizing the two marijuana cigarettes plus the 53 white pills which were spread throughout the car. We answer in the affirmative. Our response is predi…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• State v. Starkey, 559 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …ts which can be seen within. Such observation is not a “search” under the Fourth Amendment and involves no legally recognized intrusion. See Adoue v. State, 408 So. 2d 567 (Fla.1981); State v. Flores, 305 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 315 So. 2d 189 (Fla.1975); and W. LaFave, Search and Seizure, A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment, § 2.5(b) (West 2d ed. 1987). Therefore, the issue in this case relates to the entry of the vehicle and the seizure of the cartridges, not to Bridges’s initial observa…
• Cobb v. State, 378 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …grees—that the marijuana would have been subject to seizure if officer Thomas had been able to see it through an open window from a point outside the vehicle. See State v. Hall, supra; State v. Flores, 305 So. 2d 292 (Fla.2d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 315 So. 2d 189 (Fla.1975). The defendant therefore contends only that she did not have the right to make the “intrusion” into his privacy involved in the act which caused the cannabis to come into her “plain view,” that of opening the car door. It is undisputed, h…

Authorities Cited

• Reynold Frink v. State, 302 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)