KATHRYN CARRINGTON, PETITIONER,

v.

DEEL MOTORS, INC., RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Cavalier Ins. Corp. v. Myles, 347 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
  …collision. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to recover no-fault benefits in this case, but only if the injury is caused by physical contact with a motor vehicle. In Deel Motors, Inv. v. Carrington, 305 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1975), cert. den. 315 So. 2d 197 (Fla.1975), our sister court considered the question of what constituted a “motor vehicle” as defined by F.S. 627.-732(1), and there decided that a new, unregistered, although otherwise registerable, station wagon which was taken out of an automobil…
• Spence v. Hughes, 485 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)
  …ould avoid an interpretation which would produce unreasonable consequences. See, e.g., Miller v. City of Indian Har-bour Beach, 453 So. 2d 107, 112 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). Deel Motors, Inc. v. Carrington, 305 So. 2d 811 (Fla.3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 315 So. 2d 197 (Fla.1975) (when a statute is capable of two interpretations, the one that produces an incongruous result should be avoided).…

Authorities Cited

• Deel Motors, Inc. v. Carrington, 305 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)