CLARENCE GREEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Clarence Green was charged with manslaughter by intoxicated driving and culpable negligence after his automobile struck and killed another driver. The trial court granted judgment of acquittal on the intoxication count, and the jury convicted him of aggravated assault as a lesser offense. The appellate court reversed, holding that the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain a conviction for culpable negligence.
The court held that the evidence was legally insufficient as a matter of law to sustain a conviction for culpable negligence, and therefore Green was entitled to a judgment of acquittal on the manslaughter charge and all lesser included offenses, including the aggravated assault conviction.
[1] Proof of intent for aggravated assault may be supplied by proof of conduct equivalent to culpable negligence where there is no proof of an intentional assault.
[2] Evidence of driving at a speed estimated as "very very fast" and the smell of alcohol on a person and in their automobile is insufficient as a matter of law to sustain a…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Aggravated assault is a crime of intent. Where, as here, there is no proof of an intentional assault, proof of intent may be supplied by proof of conduct equivalent to culpable negligence.”
Establishes the legal standard for establishing aggravated assault through culpable negligence
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGreen's southbound automobile struck another vehicle at an intersection on John Young Parkway in Orange County, Florida, killing the other driver. The…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Manslaughter By Driving While Intoxicated cases and more on FLexlaw
OWEN, Chief Judge.
An automobile operated by appellant struck another automobile, causing the death of its driver. Appellant was charged with manslaughter (1) by driving while intoxicated, and (2) by culpable negligence. At the close of the state’s case, the court granted appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal on the count involving intoxication. The culpable negligence count went to the jury which returned a verdict of guilty as to aggravated assault, a lesser offense.
Aggravated assault is a crime of intent. Where, as here, there is no proof of an intentional assault, proof of intent may be supplied by proof of conduct equiv alent to culpable negligence. Preston v. State, 56 So. 2d 543 (Fla.1952); Cannon v. State, 91 Fla. 214, 107 So. 360 (1926); DuPree v. State, 310 So. 2d 396 (2nd DCA Fla.1975). Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to sustain a finding of culpable negligence. We conclude that this contention has merit and is dispositive of the appeal.
The collision occurred on a clear dry night in the southbound lanes of a divided four-lane limited access highway in Orange County, Florida known as John Young Parkway. Appellant, southbound on the parkway, was approaching the intersection of Silverstar Road, an undivided two-lane road running in an east and west direction. At the same time, the decedent, operating a small compact automobile northbound on John Young Parkway, was also approaching the intersection. Flow of traffic at the intersection was regulated by a series of traffic control lights which at the time of the collision indicated green for north and south traffic and red for east and west traffic. When decedent reached the intersection with Silverstar Road, she turned left on to Silverstar Road and proceeded without stopping into the intersection with the southbound lanes of John Young Parkway, where her automobile was struck on the right side by the automobile operated by appellant. Immediately prior to the collision, appellant sounded his horn, applied his brakes and swerved from the left-hand to the right-hand southbound lane in an attempt to avoid the collision. The speed limit at this point was 65 miles per hour. One eye-witness estimated appellant’s speed at 45 miles per hour while two others, driving southbound vehicles passed by appellant just before the collision, described his speed simply as “very very fast”. The only evidence relating at all to intoxication was the testimony of one police officer that he detected about the person and automobile of the appellant the smell associated with the impurities found in alcoholic beverages.
The foregoing facts, stated most favorably to the state, fall far short of those which in numerous cases the courts of this state have found to he legally insufficient to sustain a conviction of manslaughter by culpable negligence. See, Smith v. State, 65 So. 2d 303 (Fla.1953); Maxey v. State, 64 So. 2d 677 (Fla.1953); Preston v. State, supra; DuPree v. State, supra; Peel v. State, 291 So. 2d 226 (1st DCA Fla.1974); Scarborough v. State, 188 So. 2d 877 (2nd DCA Fla.1966); Day v. State, 154 So. 2d 340 (2nd DCA Fla.1963); Grimley v. State, 114 So. 2d 630 (1st DCA Fla.1959); Jackson v. State, 100 So. 2d 839 (1st DCA Fla.1958); Fowlkes v. State, 100 So. 2d 826 (3rd DCA Fla.1957).
We conclude that appellant was entitled to a judgment of acquittal on the count charging manslaughter by culpable negligence, including the several lesser included offenses thereunder. This conclusion makes it unnecessary for us to consider the remaining points which appellant has raised on this appeal. The judgment is reversed and this cause remanded with instructions that appellant be discharged.
Reversed and remanded.
CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alphonse Kelly v. State, 552 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)…vated assault committed on Dorothy. Aggravated assault is a crime of intent. Where, as here, there is no proof of an intentional assault on the victim, that proof may be supplied by proof of conduct equivalent to culpable negligence, Green v. State, 315 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), or by proof of willful and reckless disregard for the safety of others. Dupree v. State, 310 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). The evidence is clear that Kelly knew Dorothy was in the car (she was driving), yet shot into her car no…
-
Somers v. United States, 15 F.4th 1049 (11th Cir. 2021)…explained its ruling in this way: Aggravated assault is a crime of intent. Where, as here, there is no proof of an intentional assault on the victim, that proof may be supplied by proof of conduct equivalent to culpable negligence, Green v. State, 315 So.2d 499 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), or by proof of willful and reckless disregard for the safety of others. Dupree v. State, 310 So.2d 396 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). In LaValley v. State, 633 So. 2d 1126, 1128 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), the Fifth District Court of Appeal reli…
Authorities Cited (11 total)
- Cannon v. State, 107 So. 360 (Fla. 1926)
- Smith v. State, 65 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 1953)
- Earnest Leon Jackson v. State, 100 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958)
- Peel v. State, 291 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
- Buford T. Scarborough v. State, 188 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
- Maxey v. State, 64 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 1953)
- DAY v. State, 154 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
- Maynard Grady Fowlkes v. State, 100 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 3d DCA 1957)
- Marie Drew and her husband v. Food Fair Stores OF Fla., Inc., 100 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)
- Milledge DuPREE v. State, 310 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)